- 主题
- 回帖
- 0
- 精华
- 注册时间
- 2012-12-21
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 爆棚声望
-
- PGB
-
|
本帖最后由 wy2z7410 于 2014-1-27 22:23 编辑
Dual Wide Men
With a team of 2 wide players, it offers more room for specialism, with players able to be selected on being individually good defensively, or offensively, without having the be particularly proficient in the other. Playing with 2 wide players you can approach your allocation of roles and duties in 1 of 2 ways; the more traditional pairing of 2 natural wide players, with a more attacking and a more conservative player, or, having the wide midfielder come inside as a goalscorer/creator/passer, leaving the full back/wing back to provide the main attacking outlet, whilst the wide midfielder can still offer defensive cover on the flank too. If you play dual wide men, you should almost certainly select 1 in the full back positions, as otherwise a wing back can leave space behind trying to sit further forward than he needs due to the existing defensive cover provided by a man playing in front of him. Caution should also be taken with playing wing backs with a traditional winger, as this rarely causes the desired overloads, and more often simply leaves 2 players upfield, exposing your team to the counter-attack. The wing back tends to suit having space to attack, whereas if you play a traditional winger a more traditional full back will provide a better outball and cover.
If you wish to play with wide men that stay wide then the following combinations will be useful:
Full Back (Support) & Wide Midfielder/Defensive Winger/Winger (Attack)
Full Back (Attack)/Wing Back/Complete Wing Back (Attack) & Wide Midfielder (Defend/Support)/Defensive Winger (Support)/Wide Target Man (Support)
Full Back (Attack) & Winger (Support)
The first combination is a traditional option of more defensive player behind more offensive player, and is a very stable option. The second combination will have a player staying wide, but holding his position/the ball far more, and can be asked to sit narrower, to provide more space for the advancing full/wing back to move into and overlap. The third combination is a variant on the traditional option, with the full back pushing on to form overloads with the winger, but with 1 player sitting deeper/narrower than the other during these moves to encourage good link play and overlaps.
If you wish to play with the advanced wide-man coming infield, then the following combinations will be useful:
Full Back (Attack)/Wing Back (Support/Attack) & Inside Forward/Advanced Playmaker (Support/Attack)
Complete Wing Back (Attack) & Inside Forward/Advanced Playmaker (Support)
The first combination will be for the full back to advance from deep into space vacated by the IF/AP. If you are playing a wing back, you may have much better movement and defensive cover by ensuring the WB & IF/AP have opposite duties (Support-Attack or Attack-Support). If the IF or AP has a support duty, they will tend to tuck inside earlier on, in a deeper position, so it is important the FB/WB offers an outlet earlier on in the move. The second combination enhances the importance of this, as the CWB will need cover from midfield & the man in front to provide tracking back, should he be caught out of position. The CWB will tend to get into the final third early, and an angled reverse ball into the path of an IF/AP(S) can allow him the space to make more penetrating runs. If your IF is on an Attack duty he will tend to be playing more as a goalscorer, so wide support is generally required from the full back, although this burden can be eased by a centre-forward or playmaker drifting wide to offer an outlet.
Remember...
Plan first how many wide players you are using before you decide on their roles. If you are playing a lone wide man you cannot afford to have them doing a defence-only job, they must offer an outlet. Consider that they must also have a good defensive position to begin with, or be able to track back and defend instead. Dual wide men must work in combination, ensure they do not get in each other's way, yet are still capable of providing overlaps and overloads.
Time to add the final piece of your roles and duties - your strike partnerships.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
接27楼持续
两翼有两名球员(Dual Wide Men)(422，4231，451，4411那种每条边有两名边路球员)
使用两翼有两名球员(Dual Wide Men)球队，此提供了更多选择的空间去发挥其(属性上的)专长，如根据球员的能力可以被设置成专门去防守，进攻，而不需要两者兼顾。使用此类战术的话你可以处理其角色和职责的设置以其中一种方法;更传统的边路配置为一名较具攻击性的球员+一名较保守的球员，又或，使用一名中前卫(WM)去作为一个得分者/创造者/传球手，并留下一名边後卫(FB)/进攻型边后卫(WB)去提供为其一个主要的攻击性的出球点，同时中前卫(WM)也会帮忙在侧翼提供协防。
如果你在双翼各使用两名边路球员，那几乎肯定你一定会在边後卫的位置上放置一位球员，同时如果这名球员是一名WB的话，他的更倾向插上助攻而为对手留下大量的空间，因此他需要其前方的边路球员提供防守的覆盖(协防)。
你也应该注意当你使用WB配合边锋(W)的时候，他们的(攻击)属性重叠了，以及这的作用是仅仅放置了两名球员在前场，并影响你队伍的反击战术。WB需要有大量空间供其进攻，如果没有空间，那麽使用一名传统的边锋+一名传统的边后卫会提供更好出球及协防。
如果你希望使用上述的战术，以下有一些组合可供参考:
角色(职责)
FB(S)+WM/DW/W(A)
FB/WB/CWB(A)+WM(D/S)/DW(S)/WTM(S)
FB(A)+W(S)
第一组组合一个种传统的选择以有更多的防守球员及进攻球员，这是一个非常稳定的选择。
第二组组合虽然有一名球员有边锋位置，但他会更多的持球及守着其位置，和可能被要求内切以提供更多的空间给FB/WB插上。
第三组组合是一种传统打法的变化(变种?)，一名FB会更多的推上并和W重叠，但一名球员会在较深/窄的位置当他们的位置变动时会有良好的串联(links)和配搭(overlaps)。
如果你希望使用内切进攻型的边路战术，以下有一些组合可供参考:
FB(A)/WB(S/A)+IF/AP(S/A)
CWB(A)+IF/AP(S)
第一组组合的FB会在较深的位置进攻并为IF/AP腾出空间。如果你使用一名WB，透过设置WB& IF/AP相反的职责，你可能会有更好的跑动及协守。如果IF或AP有策应(S)的职责，他们便会倾向更早的内切，并在更深的位置，所以FB/WB及早在跑动中提供一个出球点是很重要的。
第二组组合可以互补不足，CWB需要前方或中场的覆盖去提供保护，在他应该会被阻拦的位置上(?)。CWB会倾向及早进入对方的中前场，和IF/AP有角度的传球会使其有空间去进行有渗透力的跑动。如果你的IF的职责是进攻的话，他会倾向踢得像一个得分手，所以通常需要从FB得到边路(宽度)的支持，虽然这也可以由CF/拉边的球员所分担这任务。
提醒事项...
决定使用多少名边路球前你要做好策划。如果你使用单独的边路球员(a lone wide man)你不可能只要求他们只负责防守任务，他们必须提供出球点。要考虑到他们必须有良好的位置感，又或能够叮人和防守。两名边路球员在两翼( Dual wide men )必须在组合下进行，去确保他们不妨害对方，但仍能提供配合和分担职责。
|
|
楼主: vista
发表于 2014-1-26 13:40
