FMBase排名更新了

井余 · 发表于 2022-4-10 05:29

引擎不是因该没改吗？FMARENA的不都是直接把22.3改成22.4的，怎么FMBase还要从新测呢

ZaZ · 发表于 2022-4-10 13:37

本帖最后由 ZaZ 于 2022-4-10 13:41 编辑

I would be a bit careful with the results from FM-Base. Not saying they don't have merit, but if you download their database, you will see their testing can be improved in some areas. For example, there is no player natural at ML/R position, so tactics that use those positions naturally perform badly. There are also some very unbalanced players from some positions, like a sluggish Zlatan which is often picked over a young boy with 17 pace and acceleration. If a tactic has the right positions and roles to get better players, it will naturally perform better there.

Ancient_Moon · 发表于 2022-4-10 11:13

第1那个占位和zaz5.0SS很像，只不过是边锋，5.0ss是内缝

reinkerr · 发表于 2022-4-10 09:29

引擎其实每次更新都有改动，但是官方不会说的。升0.01一个小版本，引擎都有微调，比如之前21.41升21.42就改动过引擎。

Ancient_Moon · 发表于 2022-4-10 11:08

第一名的战术谁用过 4141那个

reinkerr · 发表于 2022-4-10 11:11

Ancient_Moon 发表于 2022-4-10 11:08
第一名的战术谁用过 4141那个

第一名的看测试数据很猛，UNDERDOG胜率都有61%，和后面几个战术数据差距非常大。

京琉璃介 · 发表于 2022-4-10 15:18

ZaZ 发表于 2022-4-10 13:37
I would be a bit careful with the results from FM-Base. Not saying they don't have merit, but if you ...

I agree with you

井余 · 发表于 2022-4-10 16:38

ZaZ 发表于 2022-4-10 13:37
I would be a bit careful with the results from FM-Base. Not saying they don't have merit, but if you ...

好的学到了

井余 · 发表于 2022-4-10 16:42

reinkerr 发表于 2022-4-10 09:29
引擎其实每次更新都有改动，但是官方不会说的。升0.01一个小版本，引擎都有微调，比如之前21.41升21.42就改 ...

官方都没说，但其实有感觉到改了

想的太美好 · 发表于 2022-4-10 18:04

ZaZ 发表于 2022-4-10 13:37
I would be a bit careful with the results from FM-Base. Not saying they don't have merit, but if you ...

the new tactic really good.

niuniucats · 发表于 2022-4-10 18:28

Ancient_Moon 发表于 2022-4-10 11:13
第1那个占位和zaz5.0SS很像，只不过是边锋，5.0ss是内缝

老哥有zaz5.0的战术分享么

theodore1237 · 发表于 2022-4-10 18:45

ZaZ 发表于 2022-4-10 13:37
I would be a bit careful with the results from FM-Base. Not saying they don't have merit, but if you ...

i dont understand.excatly,the tactics which use ML/R are at the very forward position.Therefore,in fact,ML/R or AML/R,which is better?that confused me a long time.btw,my english is poor and hope u can get my point.

theodore1237 · 发表于 2022-4-10 18:47

我发现好多CZY的战术，好像是在爆棚发帖的一个大哥。

ZaZ · 发表于 2022-4-10 19:53

theodore1237 发表于 2022-4-10 18:45
i dont understand.excatly,the tactics which use ML/R are at the very forward position.Therefore,in ...

Tactics with AML/R are usually superior in real gaming, not because of performance (which is around the same), but because there are 3x more AML/R natural players than ML/R, so you can usually find better players and skip lots of training.

theodore1237 · 发表于 2022-4-10 20:33

ZaZ 发表于 2022-4-10 19:53
Tactics with AML/R are usually superior in real gaming, not because of performance (which is aroun ...

ok. u mean that a AMR/L player without MR/L adaptability should play AMR/L instead of MR/L

ZaZ · 发表于 2022-4-10 22:54

theodore1237 发表于 2022-4-10 20:33
ok. u mean that a AMR/L player without MR/L adaptability should play AMR/L instead of MR/L

No, if you have a good MR/L, it's fine to use him. However, tactics with AML/R instead of ML/R will have an easier time finding good players, since they have a bigger pool. You can still retrain them to MR/L, but it will take several months before they start performing at 100%.

阿里知返 · 发表于 2022-4-10 23:20

有没有哪个战术控球率高的，跳过式懒人玩家

[游戏交流] FMBase排名更新了