跪求翻译~！！！不甚感激！！！
wy2z7410 发表于 2014-1-26 13:27 static/image/common/back.gif
Central Trio
When playing 3 at the back, you have to consider the implications of the wide player ...
有人看呐，骚年加油~~造福大众~~
再顶一记，希望英语帝们翻译一下~~~
看完了 继续翻下去啊 太给力了
求继续翻下去~~
LZ给力啊~~14类似的帖子太少了，同求翻译。
WIDE MEN
Your wide men consist of Full Backs/Wing Backs & Wide Midfielders/Wingers. Most teams will have 2 sets of wide players, some will contain only 1 set of wide players. Your wide players have a very varied set of roles & encompassing all types of duties. There is a lot of potential for variation in your team in this area of the pitch. The formation you use will significantly impact on the choice of roles & duties in the wide areas. A solitary wide player has more responsibilities and has to be able to contribute to all areas of play, whereas a pair of wide players can share the specialisation for a more balanced set up. Sacrificing wide players is a way of having more midfielders to win the possession battle, however wide men used well can contribute to a possession game, a creative game, or be used for their goalscoring exploits, or even their work rate and defensive abilities - this applies to all positions down the flank. A full back who gets into superb advanced positions is a great asset to have, as is a winger who tracks back and makes tackles too.
Lone Wide Men
A formation consisting of lone wide players automatically begins to restrict your roles and duties significantly. A defend duty significantly reduces the contribution a wide man can make in a system where he is expected to get all the way down the flanks, as well as defend. Wide men in systems with only 1 player on the flanks typically come from the more defensive positions, to retain a good defensive shape, but then offer an outlet as the team moves into transition/attack phases. A wide man in the AM strata is highly unsuitable for this job as he exposes his team with too much space behind himself, and provides less tracking back or help in the midfield battle. So typically the wide men will make several forward runs, but will also tend to be in a deep enough position to offer the defensive cover. The further forward you place your lone wide man (i.e. wide midfielder instead of full back), the lower your duty should generally be (support instead of attack) to ensure that the wide man can cover and link play with your defence as well as midfield and attack. Crucially the wide man here must do everything, so he cannot sit and defend only, or look constantly to get into the final third and shirk his defensive work.
Some of the appropriate roles and duties for this type of role are:
Full Back (Attack)
Wing Back (Support/Attack)
Complete Wing Back (Attack)*be cautious of if he offers enough defensive cover
Wide Midfielder (Support/Attack)*be cautious if he offers enough defensive cover on an attack duty
Defensive Winger (Support/Attack)
边路
你的边路球员由边后卫(FB)/进攻型边后卫(WB)/边前卫(WM)/边锋(W)所组成。大部份的球队都有两组边路球员，有些就只有一组。你的边路球员有各式各样的的角色和包括所有类型的职责，这使你的球队打法上有了许多潜在的变化。你如何编织这些职责和角色会大大影响你在侧翼制造的机会。一名边路球员会负上很大的责任及一定要有能力去为比赛中的每个角落作出贡献，当然一对的边路组合也可以互补不足。放弃使用边路球员是一种方式去增加中路球员的数目以嬴得控球权，然而边路球员使用得当的话能控制球赛，提升创造力，增加得分能力，甚至其防守能力及工作投入也可帮忙球队(适用於侧翼的所有位置)。一名有极佳进攻才艺的边后卫及一名有能力进行叮人及逼抢的边锋对球队而言都是其有价值的。
单独的边路球员(我想他应该是指343中的边前卫或4222的边后卫，那种边路只有一人的边路球员)
一个只使用一名边路球员的阵型会自动限制其职责和角色(即自由度下降吧...)。设立一个防守的职责会显着地减少一名边路球员所作出的贡献，如果他须要一个人负责整条边路的话。
只有一人在边路的话，他通常会更常的在其防守位置上,以保持一个良好阵式防御的完整。然而他也要提供一个出球点供球队进入过渡/攻击的阶段。
一名在AM(攻击中场)位置的边路球员是绝对不合适於边路只有一人的阵式，因为在他身後会暴露更大的空间，以及会减少进行拦截或帮忙中路的球员。
所以此类的球员会插上助攻，但也往往会留有较後的位置以提供防守覆盖。所以如果你使用一个较前位置的边路球员在单人的侧翼上(如以边前卫(WM)代替边後卫(FB)，其职责一般应被调低(由策应取代进攻)，以确保他可以覆盖(协防)後防及串联前中场。
最重要的是这种边路球员必须负担起一切任务(do everything)，所以他不可以单单站着和防守，又或不断的进入中前场和放弃其防守工作。
其实上文我也是一知半解，但简单而言就是打343OR42222等只有单边路球员的阵式时，他必须全能，无论是设置，属性，职责也一样。
以下是一些对这类球员适合的角色和职责:
边后卫(FB)-进攻(A)
进攻型边后卫(WB)-进攻(A)/策应(S)
全能边後卫(CWB)-进攻(A)*注意他是否提供了足够的防守覆盖
边前卫~纵深型边前卫(WM)-策应(S)/进攻(A)*注意他是否提供了足够的防守覆盖在进攻的职责上
防守型边锋(DW)-进攻(A)/策应(S)
持续
真是又臭又长。
wy2z7410 发表于 2014-1-26 21:11 static/image/common/back.gif
WIDE MEN
Your wide men consist of Full Backs/Wing Backs & Wide Midfielders/Wingers. Most teams wi ...
感谢翻译，感谢分享~
纯理论而已，FM14里 很难实现
wy2z7410 发表于 2014-1-26 21:11 static/image/common/back.gif
WIDE MEN
Your wide men consist of Full Backs/Wing Backs & Wide Midfielders/Wingers. Most teams wi ...
翻译得不错，加油加油！
继续加油吧！！谢谢！！
继续翻译吧，谢谢~
本帖最后由 wy2z7410 于 2014-1-27 22:23 编辑
Dual Wide Men
With a team of 2 wide players, it offers more room for specialism, with players able to be selected on being individually good defensively, or offensively, without having the be particularly proficient in the other. Playing with 2 wide players you can approach your allocation of roles and duties in 1 of 2 ways; the more traditional pairing of 2 natural wide players, with a more attacking and a more conservative player, or, having the wide midfielder come inside as a goalscorer/creator/passer, leaving the full back/wing back to provide the main attacking outlet, whilst the wide midfielder can still offer defensive cover on the flank too. If you play dual wide men, you should almost certainly select 1 in the full back positions, as otherwise a wing back can leave space behind trying to sit further forward than he needs due to the existing defensive cover provided by a man playing in front of him. Caution should also be taken with playing wing backs with a traditional winger, as this rarely causes the desired overloads, and more often simply leaves 2 players upfield, exposing your team to the counter-attack. The wing back tends to suit having space to attack, whereas if you play a traditional winger a more traditional full back will provide a better outball and cover.
If you wish to play with wide men that stay wide then the following combinations will be useful:
Full Back (Support) & Wide Midfielder/Defensive Winger/Winger (Attack)
Full Back (Attack)/Wing Back/Complete Wing Back (Attack) & Wide Midfielder (Defend/Support)/Defensive Winger (Support)/Wide Target Man (Support)
Full Back (Attack) & Winger (Support)
The first combination is a traditional option of more defensive player behind more offensive player, and is a very stable option. The second combination will have a player staying wide, but holding his position/the ball far more, and can be asked to sit narrower, to provide more space for the advancing full/wing back to move into and overlap. The third combination is a variant on the traditional option, with the full back pushing on to form overloads with the winger, but with 1 player sitting deeper/narrower than the other during these moves to encourage good link play and overlaps.
If you wish to play with the advanced wide-man coming infield, then the following combinations will be useful:
Full Back (Attack)/Wing Back (Support/Attack) & Inside Forward/Advanced Playmaker (Support/Attack)
Complete Wing Back (Attack) & Inside Forward/Advanced Playmaker (Support)
The first combination will be for the full back to advance from deep into space vacated by the IF/AP. If you are playing a wing back, you may have much better movement and defensive cover by ensuring the WB & IF/AP have opposite duties (Support-Attack or Attack-Support). If the IF or AP has a support duty, they will tend to tuck inside earlier on, in a deeper position, so it is important the FB/WB offers an outlet earlier on in the move. The second combination enhances the importance of this, as the CWB will need cover from midfield & the man in front to provide tracking back, should he be caught out of position. The CWB will tend to get into the final third early, and an angled reverse ball into the path of an IF/AP(S) can allow him the space to make more penetrating runs. If your IF is on an Attack duty he will tend to be playing more as a goalscorer, so wide support is generally required from the full back, although this burden can be eased by a centre-forward or playmaker drifting wide to offer an outlet.
Remember...
Plan first how many wide players you are using before you decide on their roles. If you are playing a lone wide man you cannot afford to have them doing a defence-only job, they must offer an outlet. Consider that they must also have a good defensive position to begin with, or be able to track back and defend instead. Dual wide men must work in combination, ensure they do not get in each other's way, yet are still capable of providing overlaps and overloads.
Time to add the final piece of your roles and duties - your strike partnerships.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
接27楼持续
两翼有两名球员(Dual Wide Men)(422，4231，451，4411那种每条边有两名边路球员)
使用两翼有两名球员(Dual Wide Men)球队，此提供了更多选择的空间去发挥其(属性上的)专长，如根据球员的能力可以被设置成专门去防守，进攻，而不需要两者兼顾。使用此类战术的话你可以处理其角色和职责的设置以其中一种方法;更传统的边路配置为一名较具攻击性的球员+一名较保守的球员，又或，使用一名中前卫(WM)去作为一个得分者/创造者/传球手，并留下一名边後卫(FB)/进攻型边后卫(WB)去提供为其一个主要的攻击性的出球点，同时中前卫(WM)也会帮忙在侧翼提供协防。
如果你在双翼各使用两名边路球员，那几乎肯定你一定会在边後卫的位置上放置一位球员，同时如果这名球员是一名WB的话，他的更倾向插上助攻而为对手留下大量的空间，因此他需要其前方的边路球员提供防守的覆盖(协防)。
你也应该注意当你使用WB配合边锋(W)的时候，他们的(攻击)属性重叠了，以及这的作用是仅仅放置了两名球员在前场，并影响你队伍的反击战术。WB需要有大量空间供其进攻，如果没有空间，那麽使用一名传统的边锋+一名传统的边后卫会提供更好出球及协防。
如果你希望使用上述的战术，以下有一些组合可供参考:
角色(职责)
FB(S)+WM/DW/W(A)
FB/WB/CWB(A)+WM(D/S)/DW(S)/WTM(S)
FB(A)+W(S)
第一组组合一个种传统的选择以有更多的防守球员及进攻球员，这是一个非常稳定的选择。
第二组组合虽然有一名球员有边锋位置，但他会更多的持球及守着其位置，和可能被要求内切以提供更多的空间给FB/WB插上。
第三组组合是一种传统打法的变化(变种?)，一名FB会更多的推上并和W重叠，但一名球员会在较深/窄的位置当他们的位置变动时会有良好的串联(links)和配搭(overlaps)。
如果你希望使用内切进攻型的边路战术，以下有一些组合可供参考:
FB(A)/WB(S/A)+IF/AP(S/A)
CWB(A)+IF/AP(S)
第一组组合的FB会在较深的位置进攻并为IF/AP腾出空间。如果你使用一名WB，透过设置WB& IF/AP相反的职责，你可能会有更好的跑动及协守。如果IF或AP有策应(S)的职责，他们便会倾向更早的内切，并在更深的位置，所以FB/WB及早在跑动中提供一个出球点是很重要的。
第二组组合可以互补不足，CWB需要前方或中场的覆盖去提供保护，在他应该会被阻拦的位置上(?)。CWB会倾向及早进入对方的中前场，和IF/AP有角度的传球会使其有空间去进行有渗透力的跑动。如果你的IF的职责是进攻的话，他会倾向踢得像一个得分手，所以通常需要从FB得到边路(宽度)的支持，虽然这也可以由CF/拉边的球员所分担这任务。
提醒事项...
决定使用多少名边路球前你要做好策划。如果你使用单独的边路球员(a lone wide man)你不可能只要求他们只负责防守任务，他们必须提供出球点。要考虑到他们必须有良好的位置感，又或能够叮人和防守。两名边路球员在两翼( Dual wide men )必须在组合下进行，去确保他们不妨害对方，但仍能提供配合和分担职责。
我又来顶了，加油加油~
加油加油~~
阵型在哪？有下载吗
顶顶更健康，翻译的大神↖(^ω^)↗ ~~加油~~
怒顶一记，大神加油~~
看看是否能从中得到启发
非常好，才玩上游戏，非常需要知识，谢谢大家的努力，