你好，ZAZ. 使用green 5.0战术测试100场英超比赛，经常发现在进攻中压制对手退守禁区线附近；MC会经常从肋部进入禁区配合前锋抢点，IWB回在禁区外围接应传中射门；IF会在禁区线左右两侧准备斜插禁区；此时会出现进攻宽度不够，边路没有人接应，导致DC带球走边路再传给IF。请问战术中设置两个IWB，两个IF，同时中场没有MEZ职责。进攻宽度利用不够的情况下，是否可以选择把边后卫职责改为攻击性边后卫或者全能边后卫，增加边路接应。
你好zaz，用了GREEN5.0效果很不错，结合BLUE4.0应对不同阵型更合理，但我这里还是有两问题想要请教。一、当球员习惯和战术设置发生冲突的时候，是会以战术设置优先有效，还是会减弱两方效果？所以应该取消球员的战术设置？改掉球员习惯或者换球员？还是可以完全无视？二、当球员个人设置和球队战术设置发生冲突的时候又会怎样？比如球员个人设置“凶狠抢断”，又在球队战术板上点了“不要太凶”，可以看到战术压迫显示有所降低，所以这只是单纯的减弱效果么？还是会造成别的混乱，尽量不要有冲突的设置？
Hello zaz, the effect of using GREEN5.0 is very good, and it is more reasonable to deal with different formations with BLUE4.0, but I still have two questions here that I want to ask.
First, when the player's habits and tactical settings conflict, will the tactical settings be prioritized and effective, or will the effect of the two parties be weakened? So should the player's tactical settings be abolished? Break player habits or change players? Or can it be completely ignored?
Second,What happens when the player's personal settings and the team's tactical settings conflict? For example, the player's personal setting of "fierce tackling", and then on the team's tactical board clicked "don't be too fierce", you can see that the tactical pressure shows a decrease, so is this just a simple weakening effect? Or will it cause other confusion and try not to have conflicting settings?
Anyway thanks~!
MUN01 发表于 2022-5-13 16:16
你好，ZAZ. 使用green 5.0战术测试100场英超比赛，经常发现在进攻中压制对手退守禁区线附近；MC会经常从肋 ...
As far as I know, team instructions have priority over player instructions, except on roles with the instruction locked. That means setting "stay on feet" will override any "tackle harder" or "ease off tackles". About player individual traits, I believe they have priority over the player instructions, but not over team instructions (that's just my guess, I can't confirm for sure). Anyway, I always try to delete traits that go against my tactic, and focus on learning only those that reinforce what I want them to do.
MUN01 发表于 2022-5-13 16:16
你好，ZAZ. 使用green 5.0战术测试100场英超比赛，经常发现在进攻中压制对手退守禁区线附近；MC会经常从肋 ...
You can change IWB-At for FB-At with similar instructions, but instead of cut inside ask him to run wide. The performance will be slightly lower, but nothing that will destroy the tactic completely.
ZaZ 发表于 2022-5-15 18:15
You can change IWB-At for FB-At with similar instructions, but instead of cut inside ask him to ru ...
Thank you, ZAZ{:16_788:}
本帖最后由 bitdarkspirit 于 2022-5-17 00:45 编辑
ZaZ你好，想请教个问题：比如blue 4.0或其他任何一个战术，当应用到一个球队的时候，会发生球员位置熟悉度适应性问题，这种时候有两种选择，一种是将球员按照战术模板位置训练提升位置适应度大概需要一个赛季多，第二种是将对应战术模板位置球员调到当下位置适合自己的细分位置角色。请问这两种哪种效果好些，谢谢
T: "ZaZ hello, I would like to ask a question: for example, blue 4.0 or any other tactic, when applied to a team, there will be a player position familiarity adaptability problem, this time there are two choices, one is to train the player according to the tactical template position to improve the position adaptability of the position takes more than one season, the second is to adjust the corresponding tactical template position player to the current position to suit their own subdivision position role. Please ask which of these two works better, thank you"
I don't understand if you are talking about tactic familiarity (which usually gets to max during pre-season if they are training in their specific roles), player position (but players should already be at least accomplished), or role ability. If you mean the last one, then you can safely ignore it. Those stars are merely cosmetic and they are just the opinion of your assistant manager on that player ability for the role. It has zero effect on actual game.
P.S.: It took me over 5 minutes to figure out how to pass the new security check for posting.
ZaZ 发表于 2022-5-17 05:50
T: "ZaZ hello, I would like to ask a question: for example, blue 4.0 or any other tactic, whe ...
非常感谢详细的解答
welcome bro
ZaZ 发表于 2022-5-17 05:50
T: "ZaZ hello, I would like to ask a question: for example, blue 4.0 or any other tactic, whe ...
It seems that tactical familiarity is also feedback from the assistant, and it also includes role abilities, so we should also ignore some of them, right?
PS：the new security check for posting is really annoying, not to mention foreigners. Thank you very much for your patient reply.
什么时候研发新阵型啊。期待
zaz的所有阵型都很好用，只是SS这个位置，总感觉可有可无没什么存在感，不知道是版本的问题还是什么，我试过B费、蒂亚戈、萨拉赫，各种类型的球员在这位置都不好用，评分都不高
welcome bro!
你好zaz，我很喜欢你的战术，它在比赛中的表现看起来就像一个严谨的战术大师，让比赛变得更加容易赢。
然而，我注意到你的战术里，边锋的表现通常都不太好，似乎更像是在为内切型边后卫拉扯空间，而不是自己在发挥攻击力。如果把边锋取消掉，换成3名前锋是否更加高效呢？
Hello zaz, I like your tactics very much. Its performance in the game looks like a rigorous tactical master, making the game easier to win.
However, I notice that in your tactics, the wingers usually don't perform very well. It seems that they are more like pulling space for the internal cutting full backs than playing their own attack. Is it more efficient to replace the winger with three strikers?
XXFXVVVVVVVVV
warm welcome for you! I like many awsome tactics from you, keep fighting!
welcome cordially
666666666666666666666666666666666
6666666666666666666666666666666666
非常感谢你的工作。每当看见因为足球这项运动，全世界的人们能够在一起共同分享，传递智慧，就非常感动。